Data is being prepared for you...

Introduction

The Annual European Insurance Overview is published by EIOPA as an extension of its statistical services in order to provide an easy-to-use and accessible overview of the European (re)insurance sector. The report is based on annually reported Solvency II information. This ensures that the data has a high coverage in all countries and is reported in a consistent manner across the EEA.

The report is objective, factual and data driven and does not contain analysis or policy messages. All indicators used in the report are calculated from the reported data from undertakings. All distributions displayed are unweighted, treating all undertakings in all countries equally. While the topics and indicators covered is intended to be relatively stable over time, the report will be adapted to respond to changes in micro prudential and supervisory priorities. It will therefore support the supervisory community and industry with highly relevant and easily-accessible data at European level.

This report is based on Annual reporting for 2023 with year on year changes calculated between 2022 and 2023. The report is published with all data available for download in a separate excel file. Please note that some figures may represent only a subset of the full dataset to enhance clarity and readability.


Life Sector

  • Life gross written premium increased in EEA between 2022 and 2023 by 1%, although trends varied across individual countries.
  • The 10 biggest life premium writers in Germany account for less than 50% of the gross written premium, making it the least concentrated market by this metric.
  • In the EEA, profit-participation business represents the largest segment of life gross written premiums, contributing to over one-third of the total life premiums.

Figure 1 Life concentration

    The concentration indicator is a measure of the market share of the national gross written premium (GWP) that the 3, 5 and 10 biggest life premium writers account for.

Figure 2 Change in gross written premium from 2022 to 2023

    The aggregated gross written premium (GWP) for life business, both for 2022 and 2023 are displayed per country.

Figure 3 Distribution of change in gross written premium from 2022 to 2023

    The year on year growth in gross written premium (GWP) is the increase or decrease in premiums written this year compared to last. The chart shows interquartile range and median. Sample shows only undertaking reporting in both 2022 and 2023.

Figure 4 Share of reinsurance per line of business

    Defined as the percentage of gross written premium (GWP) ceded to reinsurers. The chart shows interquartile range and median. Market shares of the different lines of business (LOB) not considered in the calculation.

Figure 5 Year on year growth in gross written premium per line of business

    The year on year growth in gross written premium (GWP) is the increase or decrease in premiums written this year compared to last; for each line of business (LOB). The chart shows interquartile range and median. Sample shows only undertakings reporting in both 2022 and 2023.

Figure 6 Gross written premium split by line of business per country

    The volume of gross written premium (GWP) by line of business for each country expressed as a percentage of total GWP.

Figure 7 Location of underwriting per country

    The location of underwriting for any life business written by all undertaking and their EEA branches, including by freedom of establishment (FOE) and freedom to provide services (FPS), within the EEA.

Figure 8 Gross written premium by line of business and business type

    The total direct business & reinsurance life market split into lines of business by premium volume. Percentage values visible in chart and Euro values on hover.

Non-Life Sector

  • Non-Life gross written premium increased in EEA between 2022 and 2023 by more than 6%, although trends varied across individual countries.
  • In France, the top 10 premium writers account for less than 35% of the gross written premium, making it the least concentrated market by this metric.
  • The two lines of business that contribute the largest share of gross written premiums in most countries are Fire and Other Damage to Property Insurance and Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance.

Figure 9 Non-life concentration

    The concentration indicator is a measure of the market share of the national gross written premium (GWP) that the 3, 5 and 10 biggest premium writers account for.

Figure 10 Change in gross written premium from 2022 to 2023

    The aggregated gross written premium (GWP) for non-life business, both for 2022 and 2023 are displayed per country.

Figure 11 Distribution of change in gross written premium from 2022 to 2023

    The year on year growth in gross written premium (GWP) is the increase or decrease in premiums written this year compared to last. The chart shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 12 Year on year growth in gross written premium per line of business from 2022 to 2023

    The year on year growth in gross written premium (GWP) is the increase or decrease in premiums written this year compared to last; for each line of business. The chart shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 13 Combined ratio per country

    The Combined ratio is defined as the sum of claims and expenses divided by premiums earned. The chart shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 14 Claims ratio per country

    The Claims ratio is defined as the claims paid divided by premiums earned. The chart shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 15 Expense ratio per country

    The expense ratio is defined as the expenses divided by premiums earned. The chart shows interquartile range and median.


Figure 16 Share of reinsurance per line of business

    Defined as the percentage of gross written premium (GWP) ceded to reinsurers. The chart shows interquartile range and median. Market shares of the different lines of business not considered in the calculation.

Figure 17 Combined ratio per line of business

    The combined Ratio is defined as the sum of claims and expenses divided by premiums earned. The chart shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 18 Gross written premium split by line of business per country

    The volume of gross written premium (GWP) by line of business for each country expressed as a percentage of total GWP.

Figure 19 Location of underwriting per country

    The location of underwriting for any non-life business written by all undertakings and their EEA branches, including freedom of establishment (FOE) and freedom to provide services (FPS), within the EEA.

Figure 20 EEA gross written premium by line of business

    The total direct business, proportional reinsurance & non-proportional reinsurance non-life market split into lines of business by premium volume. Percentage values visible in chart and Euro values (millions) on hover.

Solvency and Capitalisation


  • Eligible own funds to meet the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) consist of at least 80% Tier 1 – unrestricted capital in every country.
  • The median Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) ratio exceeds 150% in all countries.
  • The median Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) ratio is consistently above 300% in every country.

Figure 21 Solvency capital requirement (SCR) ratio, distribution by undertaking type

    This figure shows the solvency capital requirement (SCR) coverage ratios by company type. The charts shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 22 Solvency capital requirement (SCR) ratio, distribution per country

    This figure shows the solvency capital requirement (SCR) coverage ratios by country. The charts shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 23 Minimum capital requirement (MCR) ratio, distribution per country

    This figure shows the minimum capital requirement (MCR) coverage ratios by country. The charts shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 24 Basic solvency capital requirement (BSCR) composition - standard formula users

    The aggregated value of the solvency risk modules for standard formula undertakings by company type.

Figure 25 Basic solvency capital requirement (BSCR) composition by country

    The aggregated value of the solvency risk modules for standard formula undertakings by country.

Figure 26 Tiering of own funds - by undertaking type

    Shows the breakdown of eligible own funds (EOF) to meet the solvency capital requirement (SCR) into the tiers of own funds which it consists of. Aggregated by company type.

Figure 27 Tiering of own funds - by country

    Shows the breakdown of eligible own funds to meet the solvency capital requirement (SCR) into the tiers of own funds which it consists of. Aggregated by country.

Figure 28 Impact of loss absorbing capacity of deferred taxes, by undertaking type

    Loss absorbing capacity of deferred tax assets (LACDT) expressed as a percentage of the eligible own funds to meet the solvency capital requirement (SCR) by company type. The chart shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 29 Impact of loss absorbing capacity of deferred taxes (LACDT), by country

    Loss absorbing capacity of deferred tax assets (LACDT) expressed as a percentage of the eligible own funds to meet the solvency capital requirement (SCR) by country. The chart shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 30 Impact of expected profits in future premiums (EPIFP), by undertaking type

    The expected profit in future premiums (EPIFP) expressed as a percentage of the eligible own funds to meet the solvency capital requirement (SCR) by company type. The chart shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 31 Impact of expected profits in future premiums (EPIFP), by country

    The expected profit in future premiums (EPIFP) expressed as a percentage of the eligible own funds to meet the solvency capital requirement (SCR) by country. The chart shows interquartile range and median.

Figure 32 Solvency capital requirement (SCR) ratio with & without transitionals, LTGs - all undertakings

    The solvency capital requirement (SCR) ratio calculated with & without the impact of transitionals and long term guarantees (LTG), respectively. Sample includes all undertakings irrespective of whether or not they use any of the measures.

Figure 33 Solvency capital requirement (SCR) ratio with & without transitionals, LTGs - undertakings using measures

    The solvency capital requirement (SCR) ratio calculated with & without the impact of transitionals and long term guarantee (LTG) measures, respectively. Sample includes undertakings who use at least one of the measures.

Figure 34 Impact of transitionals & LTG per country

    The impact of transitionals and impact of long term guarantee (LTG) measures are calculated as a percentage of the eligible own funds to meet the solvency capital requirement (SCR). Sample includes life undertakings who use at least one of the measures.

Investments


  • Government bonds, corporate bonds, and collective investment undertakings (CIUs) together account for the majority of direct investments (excluding look-through).
  • In recent years, France has consistently been the leading issuer country for investments in both government and corporate bonds.
  • The United Sates are by far the most prominent non EEA exposure country for equity investments.

Figure 35 CIC category

Total portfolio

    Only direct investments without look-through approach are included. The complementary identification code (CIC) is a set of industry standard codes for identifying the specific type of financial instrument under Solvency II. For more detailed break down of the category “Other investments” please refer to the data-file.

Non unit linked portfolio

    Only direct investments without look-through approach are included. Data shows assets held neither in index- nor unit linked contracts. The complementary identification code (CIC) is a set of industry standard codes for identifying the specific type of financial instrument under Solvency II. For more detailed break down of the category “Other investments” please refer to the data-file.

Unit linked portfolio

    Only direct investments without look-through approach are included. Data shows assets held in index- and unit linked contracts. The complementary identification code (CIC) is a set of industry standard codes for identifying the specific type of financial instrument under Solvency II. For more detailed break down of the category “Other investments” please refer to the data-file.

Figure 36 Credit quality step

Total portfolio

    Credit quality step (CQS) reported for relevant assets (CIC: 1, 2, 5, 6). Allocation by country. standard formula users only. CQS is a standardised scale of credit quality with mappings to the credit ratings of the largest ratings agencies. CQS 0-3 correspond to investment grade assets with 4-6 being non-investment grade.

Non unit linked portfolio

    Credit quality step (CQS) reported for relevant assets (CIC: 1, 2, 5, 6). Data shows assets held neither in index- nor unit linked contracts. Allocation by country. standard formula users only. CQS is a standardised scale of credit quality with mappings to the credit ratings of the largest ratings agencies. CQS 0-3 correspond to investment grade assets with 4-6 being non-investment grade.

Unit linked portfolio

    Credit quality step (CQS) reported for relevant assets (CIC: 1, 2, 5, 6). Data shows assets held in index- and unit linked contracts. Allocation by country. standard formula users only. CQS is a standardised scale of credit quality with mappings to the credit ratings of the largest ratings agencies. CQS 0-3 correspond to investment grade assets with 4-6 being non-investment grade.

Figure 37 Issuer country of government bonds

Total portfolio

    The location of investment for all government bonds (i.e. CIC main category is equal to 1). Those figures don’t show government bonds held via other investment vehicles, i.e. no look-through. The category ‘Other’ includes non EEA countries not explicitly listed, as well as issuers such as supranational organizations and European Union institutions.

Non unit linked portfolio

    The location of investment for all government bonds (i.e. CIC main category is equal to 1) held neither in index- nor unit linked contracts. Those figures don’t show government bonds held via other investment vehicles, i.e. no look-through. The category ‘Other’ includes non EEA countries not explicitly listed, as well as issuers such as supranational organizations and European Union institutions.

Unit linked portfolio

    The location of investment for all government bonds (i.e. CIC main category is equal to 1) held in index- and unit linked contracts. Those figures don’t show government bonds held via other investment vehicles, i.e. no look-through. The category ‘Other’ includes non EEA countries not explicitly listed, as well as issuers such as supranational organizations and European Union institutions.

Figure 38 Issuer country of corporate bonds

Total portfolio

    The location of investment for all corporate bonds (i.e. CIC main category is equal to 2). Those figures don’t show corporate bonds held via other investment vehicles, i.e. no look-through. The category ‘Other’ includes non EEA countries not explicitly listed, as well as issuers such as supranational organizations and European Union institutions.

Non unit linked portfolio

    The location of investment for all corporate bonds (i.e. CIC main category is equal to 2) held neither in index- nor unit linked contracts. Those figures don’t show corporate bonds held via other investment vehicles, i.e. no look-through. The category ‘Other’ includes non EEA countries not explicitly listed, as well as issuers such as supranational organizations and European Union institutions.

Unit linked portfolio

    The location of investment for all corporate bonds (i.e. CIC main category is equal to 2) held in index- and unit linked contracts. Those figures don’t show corporate bonds held via other investment vehicles, i.e. no look-through. The category ‘Other’ includes non EEA countries not explicitly listed, as well as issuers such as supranational organizations and European Union institutions.

Figure 39 Issuer country of equity

Total portfolio

    The location of investment for all equity (i.e. CIC main category is equal to 3). Those figures don’t show equity held via other investment vehicles, i.e. no look-through. The category ‘Other’ includes non EEA countries not explicitly listed, as well as issuers such as supranational organizations and European Union institutions.

Non unit linked portfolio

    The location of investment for all equity (i.e. CIC main category is equal to 3) held neither in index- nor unit linked contracts. Those figures don’t show equity held via other investment vehicles, i.e. no look-through. The category ‘Other’ includes non EEA countries not explicitly listed, as well as issuers such as supranational organizations and European Union institutions.

Unit linked portfolio

    The location of investment for all equity (i.e. CIC main category is equal to 3) held in index- and unit linked contracts. Those figures don’t show equity held via other investment vehicles, i.e. no look-through. The category ‘Other’ includes non EEA countries not explicitly listed, as well as issuers such as supranational organizations and European Union institutions.

Figure 40 Use of derivatives

Total portfolio

    Derivative positions split by use of derivative. Notional amounts expressed as a percentage of total shown. Blank rows indicate no derivative positions reported.

Non unit linked portfolio

    Derivative positions split by use of derivative held neither in index- nor unit linked contracts. Notional amounts expressed as a percentage of total shown. Blank rows indicate no derivative positions reported.

Unit linked portfolio

    Derivative positions split by use of derivative held in index- and unit linked contracts. Notional amounts expressed as a percentage of total shown. Blank rows indicate no derivative positions reported.

Figure 41 Classification of investments into economic sectors per country (NACE sector)

    NACE codes are the standard European nomenclature of productive economic activities. For a detailed list of all NACE codes please refer to link. Percentages shown per country, i.e. all NACE-codes for one country sum up to 100%. Darker shades represent higher percentage values.
    Description of the NACE codes

 

 

Handling instructions for documents with security markings:

https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/publications/other_documents/summary_eiopa_information.pdf

EIOPA | Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany

Tel: +49 69-951119-20

info@eiopa.europa.eu | https://www.eiopa.europa.eu